Showing posts with label Aaron Paul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aaron Paul. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

Eye in the Sky

“You tell us when to go to war, we conduct the war, and then you deal with the consequences”

In 2014, Andrew Niccol’s Good Kill opened up a contemporary subgenre for war films, which is now being build upon with Gavin Hood’s drone thriller Eye in the Sky, starring Helen Mirren, Aaron Paul, Alan Rickman and Barkhad Abdi.

Colonel Katherine Powell (Helen Mirren) is leading a secret drone reconnaissance mission against a known terrorist group and in particular, a rogue British citizen turned terrorist. On the ground, she’s in communication with local Kenyan undercover agent Jama Farah (Barkhad Abdi) and with her superior in Whitehall Lieutenant General Frank Benson (Alan Rickman). Over in the U.S, drone pilot 2nd Lieutenant Steve Watts (Aaron Paul) has just taken control of the aircraft and is in communication with the Colonel. The situation quickly disintegrates as the terrorists move location and the orders change to kill. But when a local Kenyan girl suddenly enters the equation, the question of collateral damage comes into play.

Gavin Hood’s last two films; X-Men Origins: Wolverine and Ender’s Game were monsters, with budgets well over $100 million. Eye in the Sky is a much smaller, taughter and more intelligent thriller that could have so easily fallen into tedious territory. Instead, it embraces its subject matter and - thanks to writer Guy Hibbert - presents a much more morally ambiguous take on drone warfare than you would at first think. Where Good Kill hid the ethical dilemma of drone warfare behind a pilot’s souring relationship with his family, this film puts it right at the forefront, with the military legalities and political disputes all focusing on the potential collateral damage of the situation when a young girl selling bread enters the kill zone. But Hood makes a concerted effort to justify, or at the very least explain the reasoning for both firing the deadly missile or for not. What we get is a denouement similar to Gus Van Sant’s Elephant, unsure what to make of the final outcome it forces us to consider the impact long after the credits roll.

Eye in the Sky is a masterclass in taking a simple story with simple production values and using those elements to build tension from the get go. You will never be more stressed out watching a girl selling bread than you are here. Certainly its ability to hold your attention through what is essentially an hour and a half of phone conversations is down to the abilities of its four key leads. Helen Mirren brings a fiery rage to the film, with her Colonel acting in a front-lines mindset despite being in a small English bunker. Her much more reserved superior brings poise to the situation thanks to a balanced, memorable performance from the late great Alan Rickman. Aaron Paul’s all-too brief scenes mark certainly his best dramatic appearance since hanging up the gas-mask, and Barkhad Abdi is slowly making clear that he won’t be typecast from his Captain Phillips role.

There are certain elements of the film that are less believable, the Kenyan intel use insect and wildlife drones to capture information discreetly and whilst I understand this technology is in development, I doubt even the U.S military have it engineered to the level that is portrayed. Iain Glen makes an appearance, dealing with various foreign ministers whilst tackling a bout of food poisoning, which feels like it’s supposed to be some kind of weird, unnecessary comic relief. Some of the political figures also seem to be blown out of proportion, getting hysterical at every opportunity. I can understand the emotional contour they’re trying to create with this but it can come off as overly-dramatic. However none of these small issues were really enough to harm what is ultimately a very strong piece of filmmaking.

Eye in the Sky is the sort of film you wish for as a reviewer, one that pops up with little anticipation and takes you by surprise. It’s a well-developed, well-acted, insightful and utterly tense example of how small-budget films can be extremely effective, and a great contemporary addition to the war genre. Do yourself a favour, go see this over Batman v Superman.

Tuesday, 8 March 2016

Triple 9

Aussie director John Hillcoat is no stranger to making brutally violent films. Triple 9 is no exception to this rule, showing the brutal lengths that people will go to when their backs are against the wall. While it is an enjoyable heist movie, it can at times seem a bit predictable and some of the character motivations aren't even evident.

In Atlanta, a small crew of criminals led by Michael Atwood (Chiwetel Ejiofor) are made to pull a heist on a bank by Russian mobster Irina Vlaslov (Kate Winslet). Among the crew are two corrupt cops, Marcus Belmont (Anthony Mackie) and Franco Rodriguez (Clifton Collins Jr), as well as brothers Russell (Norman Reedus) and Gabe (Aaron Paul). Despite the fact that they pulled off the heist without a hitch, the crew are forced to pull another with even higher stakes. To help avoid police attention, they come up with a scheme to murder a police officer, which they know the cops will have a higher priority to get to. They decide upon Chris (Casey Affleck), Marcus' new partner. Meanwhile, Chris' uncle Jeffrey (Woody Harrelson) is investigating the crew.

Triple 9 ends up being a very generic heist movie. It does have some surprises, but it turns out to be very predictable. As you watch it, you can pick out who will turn on who and which characters will end up dying. I suppose that that is one thing where John Hillcoat makes a tiny bit of a difference. Life in this movie is cheap, people die when you think for sure that they are the main character. Maybe that stems from packing the movie with so many big name actors. I felt as though they were all important because of the star power that they brought to the movie. Turns out, they aren't.

Another problem that arises from stacking a movie like this with stars is that no one stands out in any way. Actors like Teresa Palmer, Gal Gadot, Norman Reedus and Michael K. Williams were only cast so that their names could be put on the poster so that people would go see the film. Casey Affleck, who ends up becoming the main character only appears after twenty minutes into the action. Clifton Collins Jr. is the only actor to give a truly good performance as the surprising second villain only due to the fact that he has no star power and has to work to be noticed. Kate Winslet is also good, but only when you compare how different her role here compared to Rose in Titanic is.

All in all Triple 9 is a movie that you're going to watch for the action over the story. It has surprisingly little heart. If anything you're not going to ever want to go to Atlanta.



Saturday, 6 December 2014

Exodus: Gods and Kings

Ridley Scott's take on the story of Moses is suitably epic and it would be hard to compare it to his last two movies. But if we go back and look at other historical epics he's done, Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven, we know there's precedent for him to be better.

Exodus tells the story of Moses (Christian Bale) and how he gathered the Hebrews to escape the Egyptians. We see his exile from Egypt by the Pharaoh Ramesses II (Joel Edgerton), the plagues of Egypt and the crossing of the Red Sea. Depending on your background, this is probably a familiar tale and will be easy to follow, even guess what is going to happen next.

As stated above, Scott is fairly adept at making an epic film and this movie certainly does tick all the boxes. While it doesn't necessarily push the envelope in the storytelling department, it makes up for it with some amazing visuals and action set pieces. The sets of Memphis, the capital of Ancient Egypt are amazing and are backed up with some wonderful CGI images of the pyramids under construction. The deserts of Spain make a fantastic substitute for Egypt and match all the rocky crags that one might imagine from biblical myths. There are some amazing battles scattered throughout that display the amazing numbers that the armies of the time would have had.

In terms of acting, this really is a two-horse show for both Bale and Edgerton. Their performances aren't great, but that has to do with limited character development and that's alarming given the amount of supporting characters in the film. The stars playing the minor characters (Sigourney Weaver, John Turturro and Sir Ben Kingsley) are all given remarkably little to do but display a seemingly talented backdrop. The only person who I thought tried with his character a little was Ben Mendelsohn, who plays a slightly effete Egyptian viceroy.

Verdict: An overall good and suitably epic tale, but doesn't push the boundaries or throw you anything that you wouldn't have expected.

Sunday, 16 March 2014

Need For Speed


For a movie based on a series of video games based on a quote from Tom Cruise in Top Gun (1986) and made by the people who make the video games, Need for Speed is not that bad a movie about street races. Now I have to admit that I am somewhat partial to the series of games, so I am going to try and be objective as I can in this review.


After a long and sometimes confusing prologue where our hero Tobey Marshall (Aaron Paul) is framed for murder and a scene that has us believe kids hang out at drive-in cinemas like it's still the 1950s, we get to the meat of the story. After serving two years in prison for the murder (it was downgraded to manslaughter), Tobey is out to get the real culprit, Dino Brewster (Dominic Cooper). He is joined by Julia (Imogen Poots), a British car dealer who lends him a car to take part in a race set up by the reclusive Monarch (Michael Keaton) to clear his name.

So somehow the producers of this film managed to take the premise of two of the games (Need for Speed: The Run and Need for Speed: Most Wanted) and bash them together to get a movie. A very convoluted plot about betrayal and revenge is peppered in. The main characters of this movie are the super cars, all of which are playable in the games.

Aaron Paul (Breaking Bad) has done an okay job trying to move away from the role that made him famous. There's no Jesse Pinkman in this movie. Although trying to play a tough guy doesn't really suit him.

Dominic Cooper (Captain America: The First Avenger) does a serviceable job as the slimy bad guy. He gets under your skin with his ability to make the audience's skin crawl. Imogen Poots (Filth) does have the best acting ability out of the entire cast and I felt it was kind of wasted appearing in a film like this.

Verdict: Fans of the series of games or high end sports vehicles will enjoy. Way better than those Fast and Furious movies. 

Jasper Roberts Consulting - Widget